Level-D Dolls

April 18th, 2009 | Categories: Muddy River of Life

Part of the reason why I haven’t been typing up Part 2 of my experience at the boot camp is because Sankaku Complex posted an article about loli sex dolls.

See the first two pictures? I’m really not the kind to get into dolls. But there comes a threshold when all hell breaks loose, and that’s when I saw that maid. I’ve been digging up information on her all over the place, and what little there is to go around is hidden behind Japanese characters. Thank lord for those Japanese classes back in 2004…





The fourth image was hard to find. It, along with the first image, was hidden somewhere on Ta-bo’s site (very NSFW). Apparently he’s the guy to go to if you’re living outside of Japan and the company doesn’t ship outside of Japan (why?). There’s also Dollmate.jp, but their site hasn’t been updated for two years and some members on The Doll Forum have been unable to contact them. All other images were gleaned from SOME DOLLS, which is in serious need of a redesign, but it’s got tons of pictures.

After doing some research, I figure that Level-D must be a niche company in the doll business. The market seems to be dominated by RealDoll for Americans and Orient Industries’s Candy Girls (known for their durable dolls) in Japan. Nevertheless, they have somehow managed to stay afloat since 2002. As a guy who values a beautiful face above all other, I can see why. With the notable exception of DD-01 Karin, every head that Level-D makes is incredibly lovely. Karin and Mirei are now out of production, but there are two types of Ayana available, and a Mirei Cure, which is the original Mirei head on the Ayana body. The body? Well, I can see little seams on the sides of the body (which I haven’t seen on other companies’ stuff), but other than that, nothing particularly garish. It seems that dolls nowadays do not have posable fingers – they’re made of wobbly silicon. That was particularly disappointing, but thank lord I don’t deal with toes, or I’d probably be even more disappointed.

Well, I think there might be more as to why I prefer Level-D dolls over everything else. Maybe it’s because they look like genuine girls that aren’t made for just sex. I looked at the Doll Forum Gallery, but everything else looked comparatively repulsive – they either looked like sex dolls with open mouths for oral or scarecrows – and I said so on the forum. One poster took offence, and so I apologized – after all, it doesn’t take much imagination to conclude that I might be very emotionally attached to any doll I should own. However, given that he said that aesthetics is individual, I’m not sure that I should have apologized after all.

Just browse around online and you can see that Mirei/Cure is incredibly pretty. However, Ayana with the prototype gaijin head (yeah, they actually call it a gaijin head) walks all over her. Too bad she’s a prototype – I’d set up a sub-account in my bank and start saving 7000EURs immediately – but according to their blog, they seem open to the idea of mass producing these lovely heads. I only hope they come with the maid costume too.

The guy from Far Away Eyes also has a blog set up here, and he’s noticed the thread about the caucasian Ayana on The Doll Forum. The scary thing is that he thinks it’s because she’s foreign that we pay attention to her… oh well.

Mmm… beautiful dolls and computers. Speaking of which, I went to Schenker AG yesterday to pick up my Intellistation POWER 275, but it was on a freaking wooden palette and looked like an incredibly long computer under all that black wrapping. Plus, it was 40kg. So I left it there – they’ll be delivering it on Monday morning. If I’m really hard up on cash for gaijin Ayana, I could consider selling it – I bought it for 200EURs, but I’m confident I can get at least 3000EURs out of this thing.

And I gathered this much material on the Ayana doll in only 2 days. It’s scary to think what sorts of grades I’d get if I worked that diligently on my homework.

  1. April 22nd, 2009 at 22:32
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Dolls? Hell no. I want my girls in 2d or real 3d, not just some doll that just sits there not saying anything or doing anything.

    an of topic question: What URL do you use for the Dasaku Feed? And how did you make it into that you´re using? When I use the standard widget for this it turns very bad.

  2. April 23rd, 2009 at 01:19
    Reply | Quote | #2

    http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.run?_id=aI_i_V8Z3RGKuhhtiXrL0A&_render=rss
    What do you mean turns very bad? I am using the standard widget.

    I think dolls are at the very least way better than 2D girls. It’s hard to beat two more dimensions (time), plus you can physically cuddle with them. Plus, it’s really rare that someone comes out with a sex doll that looks like a real girl, instead of a sex doll! Hell, I’d never even imagine that a doll could look even better than most real females out there, let alone make me fall in love with it on first sight. This girl is different.

  3. April 23rd, 2009 at 15:37
    Reply | Quote | #3

    If you´ve been visiting Nibelung Valesti you recently you have seen that the RSS Feed for Dasaku har the following version:
    “Joppy’s Collection ‘09- Prinny MadnessLife, the Universe, and Anime”

    yes, that is the Blog´s title at the very end of the post title without any spacebar or anything.

    While your feed is pretty nice and clean :) But thanks for the feed URL. I´ll use that for now untill I can find out(if I do try to bother) why the other displays wrongly.

    I´m not for cuddling with dolls. If I want to cuddle it has to be a living thing. Not something that looks like that. I´m just that way.

    For the existance, yes it is rare to see this. But as said, it is a doll and therefore not something you want to cuddle with :p

  4. M
    August 3rd, 2009 at 12:47
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Yes, that manequin is pretty. Really pretty. Now you know why men used to marry young females once they were able to have children. It reminds me of my cusin in law.
    Too bad it isn’t an advanced robot that can construct and peanut butter and jelly sandwitch.

  5. August 3rd, 2009 at 12:58
    Reply | Quote | #5

    A Chobit in this doll? Sign me up! I wonder if robots will actually become ubiquitous in society in my lifetime.

  6. M
    August 3rd, 2009 at 21:15
    Reply | Quote | #6

    Ritchan: they will be banned in america and other places where women weild power. The only places that such robots will be legal is japan and places that do not punish men for having young little wives… inwhich case the young wife will be less expensive.

    Btw: chinese scientists just cloned a mouse by reprogramming skincells from a mouse. The cloned mouse later reproduced with another mouse. Once artificial wombs (advanced incubators) are perfected you will have any type female you desire. It will be illegal ofcourse, and be as difficult as getting a select fire (automatic) weapon: that is: we all knew men in highschool who could get their fellow students automatic weapons (these were not bad people: they were people that respected a man’s right to a useful firearm and were happy help out friends), in the future we will all know those who can source a clone girl from china. The advantage will be that you get a female untouched by the caustic american society, and she’s as viable as any other female for having your children. Also this will change the economics of marraige drastically (inexpensive lifelong companions.)

  7. August 3rd, 2009 at 21:21
    Reply | Quote | #7

    Now wait a minute here M, a robot with a lifelike shell like this one and a cloned girl are two quite different things. Clones have their rights too.

  8. M
    August 3rd, 2009 at 21:37
    Reply | Quote | #8

    Tell the Level-D people you want a robot (email them), that sort of thing would be multi use and thus could be mass produced (as it would have more than one market). This would drive down costs.

    It would be nice if they used some material better than silicone (or invented one): dolls don’t heal. They’ll probably not last more than a year in good condition if used alot. This is why they are not sold so much also (not durable enough).

  9. M
    August 3rd, 2009 at 22:26
    Reply | Quote | #9

    Females have rights, yes, and that is to the detriment to men. The reason you, or anyone else, considers these dolls is because they are barred from having a young female of childbearing age as a wife and servant. The only option men in the developed world have is women who are “mature” and “experianced” who “know the game” and are “not afraid to use their rights (against you). This is not to the benefit of men and many men are more attracted to younger women then older women (yes, young females who are able to have children are young women) and more attracted to compliant females than non compliant females. As it stands now, the only available and legal option, if a man want’s a wife (or whatever), is a older woman who is non compliant: that is because we live in a culture that protects rights for women, men who do not live in such a culture are far happier with their brides. Men should never suffer so that women may be “happy” (read: powerful, modern women aren’t exactly happy, but they are powerful, due to proxy violence using the police against men who try to curtail their rights, or annoy them, or who they wish to be deposessed of.)

    Since clones would not have brainwashed feminized family (be it mothers, fathers, aunts, uncles, etc: it only takes ONE to inform the police of a situation where the young woman is to be married off to a man before the “age of concent”) who do not want daughters marrying young, there would really be no one in the inner circle who wished to inform on what was taking place… and thus it would be easier for men to covertly marry clones* than other females.

    *Note: “clones” really isn’t a seperate class of people, they’re the same as any other, but may have the benefit of no supervision, and no interests alligned against you (no so called allies who whish to have them be successful “womyn”.

  10. August 3rd, 2009 at 22:39

    Firstly, I am not barred from having a young female of childbearing age as a wife and servant. I simply lack the skills to seduce females in general. The only right these females that I approached exercised was the right of refusing somebody as a sexual partner.

    Are you sure you’re not using marriage as something that locks that woman towards you? Because if you do, you’re quite wrong. Marriage makes it even more socially unacceptable for a woman to have sex with any other man, but that doesn’t mean they don’t do it. And I couldn’t give two shits about having children of my own. Stop trying to explain this with whatever biological theory’s out there, because it’s wrong. I don’t care about children.

    For a clone to be created, it is only natural to expect that the people close to the person who was cloned would also be close to the clone, especially during its first days. If not, a clone will eventually have to go through re-education by the society that you dread before they are deemed acceptable to be released (if cloning does not reproduce the mental state). The magic pill you’re looking for just isn’t here.

  11. M
    August 4th, 2009 at 03:08

    “Are you sure you’re not using marriage as something that locks that woman towards you?”
    That is the proper use of marraige: it is to the benefit of men.

    “Because if you do, you’re quite wrong. Marriage makes it even more socially unacceptable for a woman to have sex with any other man, but that doesn’t mean they don’t do it.”
    Then you kill them, the ones that do not commit adultery against you (or other men etc) live. That is the proper use of adultery laws: it is to the benefit of men.

    “For a clone to be created, it is only natural to expect that the people close to the person who was cloned would also be close to the clone, especially during its first days. If not, a clone will eventually have to go through re-education by the society that you dread before they are deemed acceptable to be released (if cloning does not reproduce the mental state). The magic pill you’re looking for just isn’t here.”

    You missed the part where all that is needed now is a skin cell and some place to grow the fetus. Enterprising chinese capi… “communists” will develope a library of such things. Getting a skin cell isn’t hard, getting egg cells (and ones of whomever you wanted a clone of) was in comparison, this is why this is a game changer. There is money to be made in the field of young obedient wives, the company will have to develope the skill to create that mental state however. Perhaps they will find a gene.

    “Firstly, I am not barred from having a young female of childbearing age as a wife and servant. I simply lack the skills to seduce females in general. The only right these females that I approached exercised was the right of refusing somebody as a sexual partner.”

    In the USA you are barred from having a female under the age of 16 or 18 (depending on juristiction) as a wife/lover/etc. If you, as an adult, have sex with your young wife, lover, etc you will be jailed for a long time, in some states you may be executed, this is spreading around the whole world and soon there will be nothing left good for men. Females commonly gain the ability to have children at 12, 13, or 14, men usually are attracted to said nubile young women.

    As for the right of refusal, the Bible correctly identified this as something that was not to the general interests of men, and thusly created a law: If a man seizes a young female who isn’t married and is not pleged to be soon (betrothed, which occured 1 year before marraige, and the girl lived in her husband’s house for that year), then she becomes a wife of his, he pays the father some money, he can’t divorce her (Dueteronomy 22). The Bible demands that all wives obey their husbands in all things etc. Young unmarried females do not have the right of refusal, nor do wives (ofcourse).

    Such laws are good for men, naturally to save face all men dispise such laws because truely they despise mankind and worship womenkind as a sort of higher moral being.

  12. M
    August 4th, 2009 at 03:46

    ritchan: I want you to get what you want. I want it to be long lasting and durable, and at a reasonable price, and at a very high quality. I believe that the proper use of religion, culture, and any type of “control” or “framework” is to get you what you want, to get men what men want. Often that involves denying females freedom and that is fine with me. I have no moral or ethical qualms with removing freedoms from women to benefit men, the only areas where morals or ethics comes in is in murder theft (of personal and real property (not imaginary property)) and maiming… and we all agree that those three things are not to our benefit.

  13. M
    August 4th, 2009 at 06:53

    Email level-d and express intrest in a robot one. For every person that emails, it is assumed that there’s atleast 1000 that want whatever is being expressed.